The cost is the gap, not the breach
Exposed credentials are rarely used the day they surface. They are bought, tested, and resold, and every week in that window is a week of fraud you will reimburse and a week you cannot account for when an examiner asks when you knew. The breach is not usually what draws scrutiny. The interval is.
Find out while it is still a warning
KeyPriv watches the places member credentials actually surface and tells you when yours appear — with the material behind the finding, so your team can act on it rather than open a ticket to investigate whether the alert was real.
Alerts when credentials tied to your institution appear
The evidence behind every finding, not just a severity score
Built to be run by a small team, not a dedicated intel function
A defensible record of when you knew and what you did
Questions we get asked
- We have a two-person security team. Is this realistic for us?
- Yes — that is the case it is built for. Findings arrive with the supporting material attached, so the work is deciding what to do rather than first establishing whether the alert is real. Most platforms in this category assume a dedicated threat intelligence function; this one does not.
- How is this different from the breach notification service we already have?
- Breach notification tells you that a third party was compromised, usually after it is public. This monitors the places credentials are traded, so exposure surfaces while it is still being sold rather than after it has been used.
- What can we show an examiner?
- Every finding retains the evidence it came from and the reasoning behind its score, both timestamped. That gives you a record of when an exposure was identified and what was done about it, rather than an assertion that monitoring was in place.
- Do you need access to our core banking system?
- No. Monitoring is driven by the identifiers you register — your domains and the assets you own. It does not require a connection into core systems.